Collaborative Exchange of Systematic Literature Review Results: The Case of Empirical Software Engineering
نویسندگان
چکیده
Complementary to managing bibliographic information as done by digital libraries, the management of concrete research objects (e.g., experimental workflows, design patterns) is a pre-requisite to foster collaboration and re-use of research results. In this paper we describe the case of the Empirical Software Engineering domain, where researchers use systematic literature reviews (SLRs) to conduct and report on literature studies. Given their structured nature, the outputs of such SLR processes are a special and complex type of research object. Since performing SLRs is a time consuming process, it is highly desirable to enable sharing and reuse of the complex knowledge structures produced through SLRs. This would enable, for example, conducting new studies that build on the findings of previous studies. To support collaborative features necessary for multiple research groups to share and re-use each other’s work, we hereby propose a solution approach that is inspired by software engineering best-practices and is implemented using Semantic Web technologies.
منابع مشابه
Empirical Studies on Collaboration in Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
Collaboration in software development is a complex issue that has been examined by various researchers over the last decade. This paper presents a systematic literature review of pertinent literature on empirical studies on collaborative software development. We found that a lot of progress has been achieved in the field of global or distributed development. While there are still many challenge...
متن کاملWhat Is Resilience and How Can It Be Nurtured? A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature on Organizational Resilience
Background Recent health system shocks such as the Ebola outbreak of 2014–2016 and the global financial crisis of 2008 have generated global health interest in the concept of resilience. The concept is however not new, and has been applied to other sectors for a longer period of time. We conducted a review of empirical literature from both the health and other sectors to synthesize evidence on ...
متن کاملBehavioral Factors Influencing on Designing Network Governance Model in Health Care Domain: A systematic literature review
Background: Establishment of the intra-organizational collaboration network has become a critical strategy to provide high-quality services with a low cost in the health system. In order to utilize the benefits of collaborative networks, an appropriate governance model in accordance with the health system is required. To design a successful model of network governance, different effective facto...
متن کاملLessons from a cross domain investigation of empirical practices
Context: We are seeking the best ways to employ evidence-based practices in software engineering research and practice. Objectives: To help assess our guidelines for conducting systematic literature reviews we have investigated how other academic disciplines use evidence-based practices. Method: This involved performing two studies, one using a questionnaire with a set of experts, and a second ...
متن کاملBuilding Empirical Software Engineering Bodies of Knowledge with Systematic Knowledge Engineering
[Context] Empirical software engineering (EMSE) researchers conduct systematic literature reviews (SLRs) to build bodies of knowledge (BoKs). Unfortunately, valuable knowledge collected in the SLR process is publicly available only to a limited extent, which considerably slows down building BoKs incrementally. [Objective] In this paper, we introduce the Systematic Knowledge Engineering (SKE) pr...
متن کامل